The Role of Intangible Features in Developing Open Spaces

Main Article Content

Ibrahim Abaid
Ibrahim Shinbira

Abstract

this paper focuses on the role of intangible
elements of the public spaces in the residential areas such as
a neighbourhood. The main emphasis is the significance of
the factor of social satisfactions on developing public spaces.
The research to date has tended to focus on examining the
physical quality of public space, particularly tangible
features, but fewer have dealt with the intangible features
that related to the residents’ social life and community
interaction. Consequently, in this research, the analysis
includes some important intangible elements such as a sense
of community, social satisfaction and safety and security in
the public spaces and the local initiatives. The research
includes two case studies in Misurata, Libya. Both cases are
neighbourhoods type with similar in size, population,
number of houses and distance from the city centre.
However, one case is a Governmental Neighbourhood GNs
while the other one is a Traditional Neighbourhood TNs.
This inquiry is a qualitative research, however, it adopted
mixed methods approach, and i.e. both questionnaires and
in-depth interviews were utilized for data collection. The
results of this study show that there are a several crucial
findings related to the importance of these intangible
elements, these findings suggest some practical guidelines to
be considered in new development projects.

Article Details

How to Cite
Ibrahim Abaid, & Ibrahim Shinbira. (2024). The Role of Intangible Features in Developing Open Spaces. The International Journal of Engineering & Information Technology (IJEIT), 5(2). https://doi.org/10.36602/ijeit.v5i2.318
Section
Artical

References

Ahlbrandt, R. S. 1986. Public-private partnerships for

neighborhood renewal. The ANNALS of the American Academy of

Political and Social Science, 488, 120-134.

Beck, H. 2009. Linking the quality of public spaces to quality of DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/17538330911013933

life. Journal of Place Management and Development, 2, 240-248.

Cattell, V., Dines, N., Gesler, W. & Curtis, S. 2008. Mingling,

observing, and lingering: Everyday public spaces and their

implications for well-being and social relations. Health & place,

, 544-561.

Gehl, J. 2013. Cities for people, Island press.

Gehl, J. & Gemzoe, L. 1996. Public spaces-public life.

Greif, M. J. 2009. Neighborhood attachment in the multiethnic DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6040.2009.01268.x

metropolis. City & Community, 8, 27-45.

Guest, A. M. & Lee, B. A. 1983. Sentiment and evaluation as

ecological variables. Sociological Perspectives, 26, 159-184.

Hanibuchi, T., Kondo, K., Nakaya, T., Shirai, K., Hirai, H. &

Kawachi, I. 2012. Does walkable mean sociable? Neighborhood

determinants of social capital among older adults in Japan. Health

Place, 18, 229-39.

Jean, S. 2015. Neighbourhood attachment revisited: Middle-class

families in the Montreal metropolitan region. Urban Studies,

Kamalipour, H., Arab, A. D., Soltani, S., Alavi, S. N. & Mirzaei,

E. 2013. Understanding Continuity and Change in the Persian

Vernacular Settlements: A Comparative Syntactic Analysis of

Urban Public Spaces in a Case Study. Current Urban Studies, 1,

Madanipour, A. 2003. Public and Private Spaces of the City, 11 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203402856

New Fetter Lane, London EC4P 4EE, Routledge.

Middleton, A., Murie, A. & Groves, R. 2005. Social capital and

neighbourhoods that work. Urban Studies, 42, 1711-1738.

Nasution, A. D. & Zahrah, W. 2014. Community perception on

public open space and quality of life in Medan, Indonesia.

Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 153, 585-594.

Roger S. Ahlbrandt, J. 1986. Public-Private Partnerships for DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716286488001009

Neighborhood Renewal.

Sampson, R. J. & RAUDENBUSH, S. W. 1999. Systematic social

observation of public spaces: A new look at disorder in urban

Neighborhoods 1. American journal of sociology, 105, 603-651.

Woldoff, R. A. 2002. The effects of local stressors on

neighborhood attachment. Social Forces, 81, 87-116

Wood, L., Frank, L. D. & Giles-Corti, B. 2010. Sense of

community and its relationship with walking and neighborhood

design. Social science & medicine, 70, 1381-1390.

Woolley, H. 2003. Urban open spaces, Taylor & Francis. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203402146

Woolley, H. 2006. Freedom of the city: Contemporary issues and

policy influences on children and young people's use of public

open space in England. Children's Geographies, 4, 45-59.