The Role of Intangible Features in Developing Open Spaces
Main Article Content
Abstract
this paper focuses on the role of intangible
elements of the public spaces in the residential areas such as
a neighbourhood. The main emphasis is the significance of
the factor of social satisfactions on developing public spaces.
The research to date has tended to focus on examining the
physical quality of public space, particularly tangible
features, but fewer have dealt with the intangible features
that related to the residents’ social life and community
interaction. Consequently, in this research, the analysis
includes some important intangible elements such as a sense
of community, social satisfaction and safety and security in
the public spaces and the local initiatives. The research
includes two case studies in Misurata, Libya. Both cases are
neighbourhoods type with similar in size, population,
number of houses and distance from the city centre.
However, one case is a Governmental Neighbourhood GNs
while the other one is a Traditional Neighbourhood TNs.
This inquiry is a qualitative research, however, it adopted
mixed methods approach, and i.e. both questionnaires and
in-depth interviews were utilized for data collection. The
results of this study show that there are a several crucial
findings related to the importance of these intangible
elements, these findings suggest some practical guidelines to
be considered in new development projects.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
Ahlbrandt, R. S. 1986. Public-private partnerships for
neighborhood renewal. The ANNALS of the American Academy of
Political and Social Science, 488, 120-134.
Beck, H. 2009. Linking the quality of public spaces to quality of DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/17538330911013933
life. Journal of Place Management and Development, 2, 240-248.
Cattell, V., Dines, N., Gesler, W. & Curtis, S. 2008. Mingling,
observing, and lingering: Everyday public spaces and their
implications for well-being and social relations. Health & place,
, 544-561.
Gehl, J. 2013. Cities for people, Island press.
Gehl, J. & Gemzoe, L. 1996. Public spaces-public life.
Greif, M. J. 2009. Neighborhood attachment in the multiethnic DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6040.2009.01268.x
metropolis. City & Community, 8, 27-45.
Guest, A. M. & Lee, B. A. 1983. Sentiment and evaluation as
ecological variables. Sociological Perspectives, 26, 159-184.
Hanibuchi, T., Kondo, K., Nakaya, T., Shirai, K., Hirai, H. &
Kawachi, I. 2012. Does walkable mean sociable? Neighborhood
determinants of social capital among older adults in Japan. Health
Place, 18, 229-39.
Jean, S. 2015. Neighbourhood attachment revisited: Middle-class
families in the Montreal metropolitan region. Urban Studies,
Kamalipour, H., Arab, A. D., Soltani, S., Alavi, S. N. & Mirzaei,
E. 2013. Understanding Continuity and Change in the Persian
Vernacular Settlements: A Comparative Syntactic Analysis of
Urban Public Spaces in a Case Study. Current Urban Studies, 1,
Madanipour, A. 2003. Public and Private Spaces of the City, 11 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203402856
New Fetter Lane, London EC4P 4EE, Routledge.
Middleton, A., Murie, A. & Groves, R. 2005. Social capital and
neighbourhoods that work. Urban Studies, 42, 1711-1738.
Nasution, A. D. & Zahrah, W. 2014. Community perception on
public open space and quality of life in Medan, Indonesia.
Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 153, 585-594.
Roger S. Ahlbrandt, J. 1986. Public-Private Partnerships for DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716286488001009
Neighborhood Renewal.
Sampson, R. J. & RAUDENBUSH, S. W. 1999. Systematic social
observation of public spaces: A new look at disorder in urban
Neighborhoods 1. American journal of sociology, 105, 603-651.
Woldoff, R. A. 2002. The effects of local stressors on
neighborhood attachment. Social Forces, 81, 87-116
Wood, L., Frank, L. D. & Giles-Corti, B. 2010. Sense of
community and its relationship with walking and neighborhood
design. Social science & medicine, 70, 1381-1390.
Woolley, H. 2003. Urban open spaces, Taylor & Francis. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203402146
Woolley, H. 2006. Freedom of the city: Contemporary issues and
policy influences on children and young people's use of public
open space in England. Children's Geographies, 4, 45-59.