Applying the Theory of Place as a Framework for Place Research in Libyan Context
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36602/ijeit.v14i2.590Keywords:
Theory of place, place, framework, Libya.Abstract
The theory of place, encompassing physical form, social processes, and symbolic meaning, has significantly shaped urban design discourse. Despite its global influence, limited scholarship has examined its applicability within North African contexts undergoing rapid urban, political, and social transformation. This paper reviews the historical evolution of place theory and its operationalization in international urban design research, followed by a critical assessment of the extent to which its three dimensions can be applied to Libyan cities. Drawing upon international and regional literature, the study examines how physical form (spatial configuration, architectural character, and streetscape quality), social processes (patterns of public space use, social interaction, and community attachment), and meaning (identity, heritage values, and symbolic associations) have been conceptualized and empirically evaluated. A synthesis of existing Libyan studies on urban morphology, heritage environments, public spaces, and residents’ perceptions reveals substantial gaps in empirical evidence, interdisciplinary integration, and participatory research practices. The analysis demonstrates that while place theory provides a valuable analytical lens for interpreting Libya’s complex urban conditions, contextual challenges, including prolonged conflict, institutional fragility, and informal urban expansion, limit its direct transferability. The paper concludes by proposing a context-sensitive framework for place-based research in Libya, advocating a shift from standardized measurement approaches toward culturally grounded and participatory interpretations capable of informing more inclusive, resilient, and locally responsive urban policies
Downloads
References
[1] E. Relph, Place and placelessness, vol. 67. Pion London, 1976.
[2] D. Canter, The Psychology of Place. London: The Architecture Press LTD, 1977.
[3] J. Montgomery, “Making a city: urbanity, vitality and urban design,” J. Urban Des., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 93–116, 1998.
[4] A. Remali and H. Abudib, Urban Form and Life in Tripoli, Libya. Routledge, 2022. doi: 10.4324/9781003099772.
[5] Y.-F. Tuan, Space and place: The perspective of experience. U of Minnesota Press, 1977.
[6] A. A. Elgadi, I. A. Wahab, L. H. Ismail, F. Abbas, and E. M. Samsudin, “Urban Planning of Sustainable Development Model for Libyan Cities,” J. Islam. Archit., vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 277–285, 2021, doi: 10.18860/jia.v6i4.13031.
[7] A. El-Hasumi, “Evolution of public spaces in the urban core of Tripoli, Libya: Dynamics of growth and change,” 2018. [Online]. Available: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:134258479
[8] M. Fuller and R. Moore, The death and life of Great American Cities. Taylor and Francis, 2017. doi: 10.4324/9781912282661.
[9] S. International, M. East, and N. May, “Janet L . Abu-Lughod THE ISLAMIC CITY-HISTORIC ISLAMIC ESSENCE , AND CONTEMPORARY RELEVANCE,” vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 155–176, 2011.
[10] N. A. A. Valdeolmillos, D. Boussaa, and M. Madandola, “The historic city of Benghazi in Libya: Towards a holistic post-conflict reconstruction,” J. Urban Aff., vol. 00, no. 00, pp. 1–21, 2024, doi: 10.1080/07352166.2024.2419059.
[11] D. Seamon and J. Sowers, “Place and Placelessness (1976): Edward Relph,” Key Texts Hum. Geogr., pp. 43–52, 2008.
[12] J. Gehl, “Two old Paradigms - and a new!,” Isl. Press, p. 288 pp, 2010.
[13] M. Carmona, Public Places Urban Spaces. 2021. doi: 10.4324/9781315158457.
[14] H. Abusaada and A. Elshater, “Practical Strategies and Guidance for Contextual Literature Reviews in Urban Studies,” Societies, vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 1–23, 2025, doi: 10.3390/soc15060163.
[15] A. A. K. Mohamed, M. G. Abdelmonem, and G. Selim, “Understanding Walkability in the Libyan Urban Space : Policies , Perceptions and Smart Design for Sustainable Tripoli,” vol. 10, no. 12, pp. 1647–1655, 2016.
[16] H. H. Abudib, “EXPLORING CONTEXTUAL CHARACTERISTICS OF TRADITIONAL MEDINAS IN NORTH AFRICA,” Int. J. Archit. Res. ArchNet-IJAR, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 325–343, 2016.
17] A. van Nes and C. Yamu, Introduction to Space Syntax in Urban Studies. 2021. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-59140-3.
[8] M. Lewicka, “Place Attachment: How far have we come in the Last 40 years?,” J. Environ. Psychol., vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 207–230, Sep. 2011, doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.10.001.
19] N. Ujang et al., “Place Attachment and the Value of Place in the Life of the Users,” Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci., vol. 168, no. 3, pp. 373–380, Jan. 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.10.243.
[20] A. Remali and H. Abudib, “Urban Form and Life in Tripoli, Libya,” Urban Form Life Tripoli, Libya, no. September, 2022, doi: 10.4324/9781003099772.
[21] I. A. Shinbira, “Conservation of the Urban Heritage to Conserve the Sense of Place, a Case Study Misurata City, Libya,” 2012. [Online]. Available: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:85554448
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2026 The International Journal of Engineering & Information Technology (IJEIT)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
