Multiculturalism and Social Interaction in Public Streets: A Case Study of Al-Khrouba Road - Misurata
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36602/ijeit.v14i1.588Keywords:
Multiculturalism, Social Interaction, Al- Khrouba Road, Misurata, SustainabilityAbstract
This paper aims to explore the potential of activating Al-Khrouba Road in the city of Misurata as a multifunctional urban space that promotes social interaction and cultural diversity, through the integration of universal design principles and the concept of the shared street. The research adopts a mixed analytical methodology that includes urban, social, and field analysis in order to understand the current characteristics of the street and diagnose deficiencies in infrastructure and user behavior.
The analysis revealed functional and spatial gaps that have affected the streets ability to fulfill its social and cultural role. As a result, the study proposes a distribution of new community buildings and activities along the street, connected to the sidewalk through interactive seating areas and tree-shaded walkways. These elements contribute to reorganizing and balancing human activity across the space, enhancing the streets flexibility and encouraging interaction among diverse social groups –especially when religious, social, cultural, and educational activities are integrated in a participatory manner.
This study contributes to the planning and repurposing of urban open space and the redesign of public streets to create a more inclusive and sustainable urban environment. It redefines the sidewalk as an interactive domain that strengthens community identity and responds to contemporary life needs.
Downloads
References
[1] Gehl, J. 2010. Cities for People.
[2] UNESCO. 2017. Culture: Urban Future – Global Report on Culture for Sustainable Urban Development.
[3] Imrie, R. & Hall, P. 2001. Inclusive Design: Designing and Developing Accessible Environments.
[4] Bugalas. 2002. Mazumdar et al .(2000).
[5] Loukaniko-Sideris, A. 1995. Urban Form and Social Context: Cultural Differentiation in the Use of Urban Parks.
[6] Valverde, M. 2012. Mazumdar, S. et al. 2000..
[7] Téllez .2024.
[8] CABE. 2006. The Value of Public Space.
[9]Özkul, G., et al. 2015. Dostoğlu, N. et al.2009.
[10]Law Insider 2024.
[11] Boucher, S. & Samad, H.. 2013
[12]WHO. 2017. Urban Green Spaces and Health – A Review of Evidence.
[13]Crossan, D. et al. 2015. Pitt-Perez, A. 2014.
[14] Schreiber, F. & Carius, A.2016 .
[15] Gökçe, N . 2007 .
[16] Wood, P. & Landry, C. 2008. The Intercultural City: Planning for Diversity Advantage.
[17] Lefebvre, H. 1968. UN-Habitat. 2016. World Cities Report.
[18] Gehl, J. 2011. Life Between Buildings.
[19] Landscape Performance Series. 2016. (Landscape Architecture Foundation)
[20] CNU .2018. LAM .2016. (Congress for the New Urbanism: Landscape Architecture Magazine)
[21] Oldenburg, R. 1989. The Great Good Place.
[22] Mehta, V. et al. 2021. Gehl, J.
[23] Whyte, W. H. 1980. The Social Life of Small Urban Spaces.
[24] Francis, M. et al.2012 .
[25] Fincher, R. & Iveson, K. 2008. Planning and Diversity in the City.
[26] Hamilton-Baillie, B. 2008. Shared Space: Reconciling People, Places and Traffic.
[27] Gehl, J. 2006. Public Spaces – Public Life.
[28] Sandercock, L. 2003. Cosmopolis II: Mongrel Cities in the 21st Century.
[29] Wikipedia. 2024.
[30]Oxford Business Group. 2024. Libya Economic Report.
[31] Al-Banna. A. 1990. The Arabic City, History, Heritage, and Challenges.
[32]Al-Shaarawi, M. Metwally. 2003. Al-Shaarawi's Reflections on Urbanism and the Environment.
[33] Spencer, C. & Woolley, H. 2000. Children and the City.
[34] Burke, E. M. 2005. Connecting Communities to Decision-Making: A Guide to Public Involvement.
[35] Evans, G. 2003. Hard-Branding the Cultural City.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2025 The International Journal of Engineering & Information Technology (IJEIT)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.










