Mechanical Vibration - A quick and EfficienMethod of Removing Damaged Prosthesis from its Cemented Position

Main Article Content

Ahmed Kadoura
Jasson Gryzagoridis

Abstract

Implant replacement or revision surgery in the
human body ranks among the most demanding surgeries
that orthopedic surgeons encounter in modern medicine.
The removal of the hardened bone cement which secures
the implant within the bone, is the cause of a lengthy
operation. Often the use of sharp surgical instruments,
ultrasonic devices etc. are employed, however all these
methods are time-consuming and present various
complications.
This paper describes the use of mechanical vibrations at a
frequency of 40 Hz, on samples of implants anchored in
animal (pig) bone cavities with bone cement. Using a rotary
hammer drill equipped with a specially designed adaptor, to
engage the tip of the implant, good results were obtained.
The implant with its cement mantle was removed in a short
time not exceeding 22 seconds.
The procedure appears to be safe and is accomplished in
a short time, commensurate with what is required in
revision surgery.

Article Details

How to Cite
Kadoura, A., & Gryzagoridis, J. (2024). Mechanical Vibration - A quick and EfficienMethod of Removing Damaged Prosthesis from its Cemented Position . The International Journal of Engineering & Information Technology (IJEIT), 6(1). https://doi.org/10.36602/ijeit.v6i1.288
Section
Artical

References

M. Vert et al ., ‘Terminology for biorelated polymers

and applications (IUPAC Recommendations 2012)’, Pure Appl.

Chem., vol. 84, no. 2, p. 1, 2012.

R. M. Guedes, M. Gomes, and J. A. Simões, ‘DMTA analysis for

long-term mechanical behaviour prediction of PMMA-based bone

cements’, J. Biomater. Sci. Polym. Ed., vol. 17, no. 10, pp. 1173–

, 2006.

P. N. Smith and K. S. Eyres, ‘Safe removal of massive intrapelvic

cement using ultrasonic instruments’, J. Arthroplasty, vol. 14, no.

, pp. 235–238, 1999.

R. Gardiner, W. J. Hozack, C. Nelson, and E. M. Keating,

‘Revision total hip arthroplasty using ultrasonically driven tools:

a clinical evaluation’, J. Arthroplasty, vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 517–521,

NICE, ‘ The OSCAR 3 ultrasonic arthroplasty revision

instrument for removing bone cement during prosthetic joint

revision,’ November 19, pp. 1–22, 2014

https://www.nice.org.uk/advice/mib13 last visited 13 Jul 2019

A. T. Brooks, C. Nelson, C. L. Stewart, R. A. Skinner, and

M . L. Siems, ‘ Effect of an ultrasonic device on

temperatures generated in bone and on bone-cement structure.’,

J.Arthroplasty, vol. 8, no. 4. pp. 413–418, 1993 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-5403(06)80041-0

P. Postawa and A Szarek ‘Analysis of changes in bone cement

damping factor and its effect on bone load’, vol 23, pp . 35–38,